• RSS
Payday loans
RedShirts 2 Ad Banner for Kickstarter

National Review Online Discusses Zombie Survival

October 15th, 2009 by skippy

No really.

Here’s the link.

Subscribe to Comments for Skippy's List

10 Responses to “National Review Online Discusses Zombie Survival”

  1. ShuttleZ Says:

    That. is. AWESOME! XD

    It’s good to know that all those years playing RPGs didn’t go to waste.

    Captcha: ruffles first – First post with ruffles? Where?

  2. spc ward Says:

    yeah but the thing about being embedded with seals in a lot of zombie movies the bad ass sf’s get wiped out

  3. StoneWolf Says:

    Its a movie. Any 1st World and many 2nd world Special Operations personnel caught off guard and scared shitless will still be more effective combatants than you or me.

  4. StoneWolf Says:

    I like the thing about gamers being the best prepared to resist the zombie apocalypse. That only works if they also camp and hit the range. Most gamers I know can’t even run to the twinkie stand.

  5. LoC Says:

    It’s a shame that geeks have fallen so far. In my day we had to work with tools, use our hands… BUILD STUFF.
    *mutters about kids who can’t tell a small transformer from a can of mountain dew*

    On another subject… if you’ve ever seen the aftermath of a few hundred rounds on target from a M249 SAW, you’ll agree with the last bit of the article. Max Brooks seems unaware of just how much damage a bullet can do to human tissue.

  6. StoneWolf Says:

    Depends on the geeks. I went to a tech college. Computer Majors and many electronics majors were pretty useless. Most mechanical, electromechanical, and some electronic guys get bored and build shit. And while I haven’t seen the effects of an M249 on human tissue I have seen 5.56 NATO, 7.62 NATO and .45 ACP on watermellon, tree stumps and frozen meat, all from rounds fired by me between 25 and 100 yards. Besides which, I know how to build bombs, light artillery, fortifications, demo walls, can hump 50lbs all day for at least three days, etc. Like I said, just find the right geeks.

  7. Twan Says:

    Max Brooks is over-rated, his books have so many fallacies. Many of his tips are good, but he takes and unfair look at M16s, forgets about ATVs, has a fetish for blades when guns kill more effeciently and allow you to keep your distance from the grabbing, fesh-eating hordes. Also, he only looks at the Romero zombies; not one mentioning of how to save yourself from the entirely pluasible infected.

    By-the-way, where the ballz does he expect someone to get a shaolin spade?

  8. Dianna Says:

    Not to quibble, but Brooks does some nice hand-waving to explain why current tactics don’t work.

    He just wanted to get to the “They’re not in a hurry, why are you?” bit.

  9. anm"ala dig till binance Says:

    Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.

  10. binance Says:

    Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.

Leave a Reply