The title is pretty much literally what the American Family Association is claiming right now.
So its not enough to have a state allow discrimination under the guise of religious freedom. You have to actively support it or you are trying to limit somebody’s religious freedom.
If we were talking about fruit instead of, y’know fruits, the entire dialogue would go something like this:
AFA:”I like apples.”
Gay People:”Well I like oranges.”
AFA: “Oranges are not as good as apples. They’re disgusting and you shouldn’t eat them.”
Gay People “I don’t see how its any of your business what I eat.”
AFA: “NO! Oranges are WRONG, and you shouldn’t be allowed to eat them! We’ll make laws against it!”
Federal Courts: “Oh FFS guys, it’s really none of your business what anybody puts in their mouth or any other part of their body for that matter.”
AFA: “But if they can eat oranges, it makes apples less delicious!”
Federal Courts: “Sounds like a whole bunch of your problem.”
Gay People: “You seems suspiciously obsessed with oranges for people that hate them so much. Are you sure you’re not just mad because you would really like to try an orange?”
AFA: “Noooooooo. And the fact that anti-orange…I mean PRO-APPLE people keep getting caught with oranges, and occasionally tangerines, by no means suggests that we are curious about your juicy and tangy citrus fruit. For reals.”
Gay People: “If you say so.”
AFA: “Shut up! We’re just going to make it okay to deny basic services to people who like oranges.”
Gay People: “That’s not very nice.”
If You’re Buying: “We’ll sell any kind of fruit you want. Apples, oranges, pears, even tomatoes. We’re fucking crazy!”
AFA: “Tomatoes aren’t a fruit, they’re a vegetable!”
If You’re Buying: “Will you please shut up and read a goddamn book for once?”
AFA: ” Why do you hate apples? STOP OPPRESSING ME!”
Follow
