<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Backscratcher&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skippyslist.com/2008/06/03/the-backscratcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skippyslist.com/2008/06/03/the-backscratcher/</link>
	<description>The Official Site of Skippy's List: military humor and other things that make Skippy giggle for more than 15 seconds</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Minkis</title>
		<link>http://skippyslist.com/2008/06/03/the-backscratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-5816</link>
		<dc:creator>Minkis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skippyslist.com/?p=98#comment-5816</guid>
		<description>"Got any naked pictures of your wife? No? ...Do you want some?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Got any naked pictures of your wife? No? &#8230;Do you want some?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freddyboomboom</title>
		<link>http://skippyslist.com/2008/06/03/the-backscratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>freddyboomboom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skippyslist.com/?p=98#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>Actually, what would have been requested would have been nekkid pictures of the wife.

As in "got any nekkid pictures of your wife?"

"Sure, wanna see?"

Above conversation virtually verbatim between a Barracks Security Petty Officer watchstander (me) and sumdood in the barracks I was going through at the time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, what would have been requested would have been nekkid pictures of the wife.</p>
<p>As in &#8220;got any nekkid pictures of your wife?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Sure, wanna see?&#8221;</p>
<p>Above conversation virtually verbatim between a Barracks Security Petty Officer watchstander (me) and sumdood in the barracks I was going through at the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheShadowCat</title>
		<link>http://skippyslist.com/2008/06/03/the-backscratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-5303</link>
		<dc:creator>TheShadowCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skippyslist.com/?p=98#comment-5303</guid>
		<description>That young man will do very well as a husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That young man will do very well as a husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stickfodder</title>
		<link>http://skippyslist.com/2008/06/03/the-backscratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-5076</link>
		<dc:creator>Stickfodder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skippyslist.com/?p=98#comment-5076</guid>
		<description>I second that motion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that motion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://skippyslist.com/2008/06/03/the-backscratcher/comment-page-1/#comment-5054</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skippyslist.com/?p=98#comment-5054</guid>
		<description>Anyone else for voting ArchaicDome "Military Wife of the Year" not only for the admission, but for having willingly done it? :P


Or does she mean she was in the soldier *holding* the phone's position? lol That deserves applause in and of itself just for the concentration required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else for voting ArchaicDome &#8220;Military Wife of the Year&#8221; not only for the admission, but for having willingly done it? :P</p>
<p>Or does she mean she was in the soldier *holding* the phone&#8217;s position? lol That deserves applause in and of itself just for the concentration required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
